Case Decision - 197776

Interim Comment
In terms of the National Heritage Resources Act, no 25 of 1999 (NHRA), heritage resources, including archaeological or palaeontological sites over 100 years old, graves older than 60 years, structures older than 60 years are generally protected. They may not be disturbed without a permit from the relevant heritage resources authority. In contexts of development applications, the developer must ensure that no heritage resources will be impacted by the proposed development, by lodging an application to SAHRA and submitting detailed development specifications as a notification of intent to develop. If the application is made in terms of s. 38 (8) of the NHRA then it is incumbent on the developer to ensure that a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) is undertaken, as s. 38(2)a does not apply. Such a study should follow the SAHRA 2007 Minimum Standards: Archaeological and Palaeontological Components of Impact Assessment Reports and section 38(3) of the NHRA.
The HIA must be undertaken by a suitably qualified archaeologist and it must comply with section 38(3) of the National Heritage Resources Act, Act 25 of 1999 (NHRA). Once the report is submitted to the case for commenting, SAHRA will provide further comments on this proposed development.
In addition to the HIA report, SAHRA also requires a detailed palaeontological fossil finds procedure to be written for the specific region because the proposed prospecting is targeting areas with high sensitive fossiliferous rocks. This procedure must be written by a suitably qualified palaeontologist for inclusion into the EMPr. The HIA and the fossil chance finds procedure must be provided to SAHRA for comments.All these documents will be assessed by SAHRA and the comment issued must be included in the final BAR.