Applicable legislation
38(8)
Decision Date
Decision Status
Case Decision

Interim Comment
SAHRA Archaeology, Palaeontology and Meteorites (APM) Unit cannot make a comment on the Upgrading of the bridge because a detailed project description was not included in the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA). The HIA does not follow the minimum standards set for a Heritage Impact Assessment. The following information should be included, in all Heritage Studies:
Project Description: Detailed construction information, what type of bridge will be constructed, including plans for the bridge. Who will be carrying out the development?
Local Cultural History, a provincial heritage site is located near the proposed development, how will the development affect the cultural landscape.
If it is a field assessment being conducted for an HIA, track paths must be included as evidence.
SAHRA will comment further on the case once the additional information is submitted to the case.

Case 9247.pdf (92.14 KB)